Jump to content

Talk:0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


0 in algebraic equations

[edit]

I am not sure if this is been said in the article but zero is used to solve equations when there are two expressions multiplied equaling zero. If solving equation x^2+3x+4=5 you subtract five to get to 0 and get to x^2+3x-1=0 then you can do the quadratic equation to find the x. Setting an equation to zero allows you to find equations with two expressions and solutions. On another equation example with (x-2)(x+3)=0, x=2 and x=-3. This is particularly useful when dealing with quadratic equations and other complex equations. If setting an equation to zero like I said above hasn’t been mentioned in the article, where would be a good place to put it? WikiGrower1 (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Terminology

[edit]

The terms qualified as "British English" are hardly that, the source given (Collins) doesn't state it either, or only for particular forms or uses. Some of them are old-fashioned or limited to specialized context, that doesn't make them "British English", not even Commonwealth English, which is what you really meant. At the same time, "null" is conspicuously missing from the paragraph, even though arguably more common and general than some others, and not surprisingly the only one actually being mentioned later (Mathematics). Your page is protected by the way. -~2026-10427-95 (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done fixed this accordingly. The page is protected due to persistent vandalism. Register an account and get the "confirmed" user status to edit yourself. Polyamorph (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Zero point energy

[edit]

I have removed discussion of zero point energy, because, while it is the lowest energy state of a system, it still has a non-zero amount of energy. Thus, I don't think its relevant here. Riverskip (talk) 01:41, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

History section later in the article

[edit]

I have moved the history section later in the article, after the mathematics section. I don't know the exact best ordering, but the math section should be beffore the history section, to allign with the order of importance. Riverskip (talk) 03:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add Rigvedic decimal enumeration context to the India section

[edit]

The India section jumps straight to Pingala, but there is useful earlier context that seems worth mentioning. Bavare and Divakaran's study of number names in the Ṛgveda finds a systematic decimal nomenclature and interprets it as an oral form of place value. The paper is also careful not to claim that the text contains a mathematical zero, so it gives us a clean way to explain the earlier decimal framework without treating decimal enumeration, a written placeholder, and zero as a number as though they were the same thing.

Could the following be added as the first paragraph of the India subsection?

The Ṛgveda contains a systematic decimal nomenclature. In a study of its number names, Bavare and Divakaran interpret the system as an oral form of the place-value principle: names for 1–9 and powers of ten are combined using grammatical rules to denote compound numbers, with the largest just under 100,000. They also note that the Vedic corpus provides no evidence for a mathematical zero, which this oral system did not require.[1]

That wording follows the source's distinction while filling in an important part of the Indian chronology. Oughtist (talk) 09:54, 8 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Oughtist, you can now make the requested changes yourself, as your account is now auto-confirmed. I'm deactivating this edit request.  Ivecos (t) 20:30, 10 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ↑ Bavare, Bhagyashree; Divakaran, P. P. (2013). "Genesis and Early Evolution of Decimal Enumeration: Evidence from Number Names in Ṛgveda" (PDF). Indian Journal of History of Science. 48 (4): 535–581.

"Square root of 0" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Square root of 0 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 7 § Square root of 0 until a consensus is reached. Jay 20:05, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply