This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amazon Web Services article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events.
Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.
Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As of December 2014, Amazon Web Services operated an estimated 1.4 million servers across 11 regions and 28 availability zones. The global network of AWS Edge locations consists of over 300 points of presence worldwide, including locations in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa, and South America.
I'm starting this discussion to follow best practices after you reverted my recent edit to this article. My goal is to understand the specific concerns and find a consensus to re-add the sourced information in a way that meets the community's standards.
The revert summary noted "some major bias issues." I understand that sections dealing with customer criticism require a very careful, neutral tone. However, your revert also removed several straightforward, factual updates that I believe were uncontentious.
To be constructive, I'd like to separate the issues. The edit included:
1. **Factual Announcements:** Sourced information on Amazon Nova and Project Rainier from the 2024 re:Invent conference.
2. **Sourced Criticism:** An expansion of the "Issues" section with sourced details on surprise bills, pricing complexity, and data egress fees.
I believe the announcements from re:Invent are objective facts and their removal has made the article less current. Would you object to me re-adding just that part first?
After that, I am more than happy to post my drafted text for the "criticism" section here for us to review together, so we can refine the wording to ensure it is 100% compliant with WP:NPOV.
My only goal here is to improve the article with verifiable, relevant information. I look forward to collaborating on a solution.
Latest comment: 10 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
maybe cover AWS Top Secret, AWS Secret, and AWS GovCloud (US) and the first-ever AI and high-performance computing (HPC) purpose-built infrastructure for the U.S. government.~2026-38073-05 (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.png)
