Talk:Argument

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Writing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 4.

"Argufying" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Argufying has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 30 § Argufying until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Argufy" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Argufy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8 § Argufy until a consensus is reached. Paul_012 (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Typos and made-up words

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article needs some editing love. There is "(iff)" stuck in the middle of a sentence--whatever the heck that is--and later "uncogent," which is not a word. Iaoscc17 (talk) 13:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

As for the first part, the context is if and only if (iff). Iff is commonly used in mathematics, and Wikipedia in fact redirects it to If and only if. Not so sure about "uncogent". Favonian (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

"Heated argument" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 28 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Heated argument has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 October 5 § Heated argument until a consensus is reached. Canadachick (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply