Jump to content

Talk:Girl math

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Anagalcala in topic Bias issue

Problems

[edit]

This article fails to identify the subject as a memetic phrase—it instead uses it in wiki voice to describe a supposed behavior among young women, which does not reflect reliable sources. Its tone is essayistic. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 19:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, it uses Know Your Meme as a source without giving us any way to verify that Know Your Meme actually said that, thus violating WP:V and WP:KNOWYOURMEME at the same time. --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 00:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Weeds Season 2 Episode 10

[edit]

Episode aired in 2003 and references girl math. It is not mentioned in the wiki. 207.121.21.17 (talk) 17:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Single source for a whole section

[edit]

The whole section "Effect of gender stereotypes" relies on a single source, specifically a paper from a conference (see WP:ACADREP). I cannot judge whether the source is reliable or unbiased, but I can see there are extremely few hits on Google for the conference series. The paper itself presents the analysis of 8 (!) posts from Tik Tok and X, of which 4 are for the somewhat unrelated topic of "boy math".

All of this might also contribute to the issues of tone and original research mentioned in comments above and in the page. I have added the template for now, but I would suggest removing the whole section. Marcello Pas (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bias issue

[edit]

A careful evaluation in accordance with Wikipedia’s neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing guidelines is suggested, ensuring inclusion of a range of evidence-based references. Anagalcala (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

This article shows possible signs of bias and may lack a balanced representation of relevant perspectives.
In an environment where accurate and neutral information is crucial to maintaining public trust and preventing misinformation, I request a detailed review.
Please assess and adjust the content in accordance with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards, incorporating diverse and reliable sources. Anagalcala (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Reply