Jump to content

User talk:DMacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 hours ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – November 2026

Erich Clar page

[edit]

I want to include a synthetic reaction that is known as Clar's reaction. It is of a certain class of cyclic ketones that condense with themselves when heated to 400 C in a mixture of zinc dust and zinc chloride.

I will add references and a description of what it is used for in synthesizing new polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Randomness WP:TRYUNPROT

[edit]

It has been 15 years since Randomness has been indefinitely semi protected. Given its low pageview count of 150, I think it is about time for another trial unprotection. dualcerbtalk 13:45, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Let's do the experiment! Unprotected. DMacks (talk) 20:51, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also found these 4 articles that also were protected over a decade ago and can be trial unprotected
Just Dance 2016, Internet begging, First Flight High School, Central Board of Secondary Education, also Just Dance 2019 can get its PC removed. dualcerbtalk 21:23, 16 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Just Dance 2016 done. Just Dance 2019 PC is by User:Samsara who seems to have left WP, so I'll do that one also. Although I had done several protections of First Flight High School over the years, the one currently in effect is by User:Kudpung. Let's get their thoughts. I don't support unprotecting Internet begging because Google tells me people still use this term related to WP, and especially the Foundation's annual fundraising banners trigger this sort of edit on several pages every year. DMacks (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
First Flight High School was getting masses of junk edits at the time I protected it in 2013 and already had an impressive protiction log. I would be inclined to leave it protected but I will not argue if someone wans to unprotect it, but it is no longer on my watch list and I will not be be able to protect it again. As lead coord of the WP:WPSCH, we won't know either. It's not something we go looking for unless someone reports it to the project. Strictly speaking, First Flight High School wouldn't pass NPP under today's GNG for schools (a plethora of sources ≠ notability) and would probably not survive an AfD. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:30, 17 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
I stepped First Flight down to PC1. It's now got a {{notability}} tag (thanks User:Issac I Navarro!), so maybe someone will jump in and find some RS and notability claims. Or, I do agree that at least as it stands it does not meet current threshold for a standalone article. DMacks (talk) 11:32, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the ping, I wasn't aware of this thread. I will see if I can find a couple sources. Issac I Navarro (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Recent history at Begging and the talkpages of that and Internet begging support that protection of Internet begging is still warranted. DMacks (talk) 11:29, 21 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:35, 19 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Degradation

[edit]

I note your revert of my attempts to disambiguate the links to Degradation. Are any of the other links on the dab page a better fit?— Rod talk 15:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done DMacks (talk) 17:28, 20 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-44

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 26 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Guidance requested against vandalism

[edit]

Hello, hope your doing well! So Im a small time page editor and have edited the page sitara brooj akbar in the past (Im not the creator of the page, it was originally made in 2011, though I regularly maintain it), currently it is going under vandalism by a user bookishreader who I dont want to ping here, he has regularly removed the sources/sections of the page for no reason only to then propose for a decade old page to be deleted due to "lack of recognition" after removing the recognition himself, he then further went ahead to accuse me of having a COI to stop me from editing. I saw you were recently online and thought to get help from you on how to handle this situation. Thank you in advance! FestusBashara (talk) 18:42, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi FestusBashara,
That sounds frustrating! Sometimes it can be hard to take the usual first step of talking directly to someone with whom you have a dispute. I see at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitara Brooj Akbar at least both of you have made comments, so that's not a bad alternative to have both of your positions stated in a more neutral location.
Now that the article is undergoing an AFD, that discussion is the place to make a case for notability of this person. Looking a the comments from various editors there, it's clear that they can easily see the specific changes bookishreader made and how the aricle has evolved over time. I agree that it looks poor to remove content and then AFD for lack of tha type of content. But they also did comment on the problem with the specific content, based on normal WP guidelines. Now whether they are correct about that action remains to be seen, and AFD will help decide it.
Could you point me to the COI accusation? I am having trouble finding it. DMacks (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hello, thank you for your response. He had accused me of the COI on my talk page, I honestly have no issues with the page being deleted, I just don't want him to first vandalize it to mislead reviewers. Thank you for your help! FestusBashara (talk) 19:17, 31 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Loch Raven Reservoir, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Clifton was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 1 November 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – November 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, election to ArbCom now requires at least 60% support. Successful candidates normally serve two-year terms, with one-year terms retained for filling vacancies. Proposals to change the election rules may now be added throughout the year and discussed on the talk page; formal discussion remains in September.
  • Following an RfC, first-time reviewers’ reviews require an experienced reviewer’s check, and GA requirements now include alt text and accessible tables. Featured articles may receive GA status during removal discussions if they meet GA criteria. Backlog drives will run every five months, with a points leaderboard and awards for the top five participants.

Miscellaneous