Jump to content

User talk:PrimeNick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 26 days ago by PrimeNick in topic Response
Hello PrimeNick! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Masterhatch (talk) 04:12, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Chill bro 2A02:8108:3087:200:A0D9:DC3A:8728:8772 (talk) 10:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jheeeeeeteegh per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jheeeeeeteegh. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
asilvering (talk) 22:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request

[edit]
cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrimeNick (block log · active blocks · global blocks · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · creation log · change block settings · unblock · checkuser (log) · SI)


Request reason:

Good day, please refer to my sockpuppet investigation below:

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jheeeeeeteegh

For any admin who can see this, I am Jheeeeeeteegh, and I'm using this account since I have forgotten my password in my main. I apologize for this circumstances.

Since as early as 2025, I have been editing and changing links from Fascist Italy to the Kingdom of Italy in which however Historyhiker assumes my edits as vandalism which Historyhiker thinks I'm dismissing Fascist Italy as a period of the Kingdom. Indeed, Fascist Italy was a period of the Kingdom of Italy, but the duration of the Kingdom was not disrupted during Fascist rule. Im not trying to dismiss Fascist Italy as a period. What I'm trying to interpret to Historyhiker the whole time is that the Kingdom of Italy was the Italian state from 1861 to 1946 and Fascist Italy was only a period between 1922 and 1943. This was the main reason that I've created multiple accounts just to interpret this to him with due respect. But Historyhiker now assumes that I have been using different IP address even that the SPI correctly shows that I have been using only this accounts; (@JohnnyContinuous, PrimeNick, RatMan7108, SirNormanton, and HeyPersonally), all of this account were created between 2025 til February 2026. I used this accounts not for vandalism or promoting Fascist apologia, but to make good faith edits and sometimes interacting with other fellow editors. I also admit that I have created another account @KingsmanDisc which will be my last ditch account here before I leave Wikipedia.


I admit that I have violated Wikipedia's sockpuppetry rule and my block evasion in my main account. And I always regret when I'm creating these accounts (including the ones that I have created in 2024) that will make my main account's reputation worse even further which is now currently banned in English Wikipedia. I apologize for anyone especially to Historyhiker who thinks my edits was indirectly a vandalism to them and I will unconditionally accept any results of this unblock request with respect and I promise that this incident will never happen again.

Decline reason:

I think you need to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. Personally, I think you also need to agree to a topic ban on the history of Italy. PhilKnight (talk) 02:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PrimeNick (talk) 02:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Topic Ban

[edit]

@PhilKnight. Thank you for responding, and I think you're one of the admins that understands me and the SPI above. And Yes I accept the results. But regarding to the topic ban in history of Italy. Does that include all or just relating to Fascist Italy and the Kingdom of Italy? PrimeNick (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

It could be narrowed to just relating to Fascist Italy and the Kingdom of Italy. PhilKnight (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your response. PrimeNick (talk) 03:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Standard offer

[edit]

Hello @PhilKnight. I have taken the standard offer for 6 months, as I'm currently engaging in Italian Wikipedia and I have been planning to return in English Wikipedia if my case has been reviewed. I would like to open up a review on on my block case which I would collaborate. Thank you. PrimeNick (talk) 03:21, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please use the {{unblock}} template again and write an unblock request for an uninvolved admin to review. You should mention what topic ban you are willing to accept. 09:19, 13 September 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

[edit]
icon
This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

PrimeNick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)


Blocking administrator: Asilvering (talk)

Reviewing administrator: voorts (talk/contributions) 01:16, 19 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request reason:

Hello to any admins. I have been blocked for editing English Wikipedia for 6 months for sockpuppetry with the reason of editing articles and redirecting links whether to Fascist Italy/Kingdom of Italy (please refer to the w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jheeeeeeteegh for much context). An admin has advised me to take the standard offer which I did. And also added what topic ban should I accept. Thanks.
Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=Hello to any admins. I have been blocked for editing English Wikipedia for 6 months for sockpuppetry with the reason of editing articles and redirecting links whether to Fascist Italy/Kingdom of Italy (please refer to the w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jheeeeeeteegh for much context). An admin has advised me to take the standard offer which I did. And also added what topic ban should I accept. Thanks.|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=Hello to any admins. I have been blocked for editing English Wikipedia for 6 months for sockpuppetry with the reason of editing articles and redirecting links whether to Fascist Italy/Kingdom of Italy (please refer to the w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jheeeeeeteegh for much context). An admin has advised me to take the standard offer which I did. And also added what topic ban should I accept. Thanks.|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}
PrimeNick (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Technical data shows no evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 14 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sent for community review (re WP:3X ban) at WP:AN#Unban request from PrimeNick/Jheeeeeeteegh * Pppery * it has begun... 04:46, 17 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Response to Kowal2701

[edit]

@Kowal2701 Hello, I am making a respond here in my talk page since my IP address was currently blocked (which I used VPN for contacting an admin) but now I am using my legitimate IP. If you meant by which account only edited by me in enwiki. All of them. All of my suspected/confirmed accs are made by me. I used them but not so frequently. PrimeNick (talk) 07:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I may add that within 6 months. I have made no activities in them. PrimeNick (talk) 07:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also I didn't know that you can still talk someone on talk pages despite being banned/blocked, that's why I had to use VPN but that was a year ago. PrimeNick (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

To Reconrabbit

[edit]

@Reconrabbit, The acc named "KingsmanDisc" is the one I used in Italian Wikipedia. Thanks PrimeNick (talk) 05:10, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you -- Reconrabbit (talk) 12:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Response

[edit]

@Kowal2701 I think I'll stay as KingsmanDisc in itwiki because I have already made substantial edits in that account. But I will choose this account PrimeNick here in enwiki because this is the only account that I remembered its password. The KingsmanDisc password here in enwiki and itwiki are different. PrimeNick (talk) 02:56, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply